How Do I Position My App When I'm Not First?

What if I told you that entering a market after someone else has already succeeded isn't the disaster most founders think it is? I mean, we've all heard the stories about first movers—Instagram, Uber, Airbnb—and it's easy to assume that if you're not first, you've already lost. But here's what eight years of building apps has taught me: being second (or third, or even tenth) can actually be an advantage if you know how to position yourself properly.

Look at Facebook. They weren't the first social network—remember Friendster? MySpace? Or consider Google, which entered a search market already dominated by Yahoo and AltaVista. The truth is, most successful apps aren't first movers at all; they're better movers who learned from everyone else's mistakes and found a way to do things differently.

The apps that win aren't always the ones that arrive first—they're the ones that solve the problem best for the right people at the right time.

When I work with clients who are worried about late market entry, the conversation always starts in the same place: what makes you different? Not better necessarily (though that helps), but genuinely different in a way that matters to real users. Because here's the thing—every market has gaps. Every successful app leaves users behind or problems unsolved. Your job isn't to beat the market leader at their own game; its to find the space they've left open and own it completely.

This guide will show you exactly how to position your app when you're not first. We'll look at follower strategy, competitive differentiation, and how to turn second mover advantage into real market success. No fluff, just practical steps I've used with my own clients to launch apps into crowded markets and actually win.

Understanding Why Being Second Isn't Failure

Here's something I need to clear up straight away—being the first app in a category doesn't guarantee success. Not even close. I've watched countless "first mover" apps disappear whilst second and third entrants went on to dominate the market. Facebook wasn't the first social network (remember MySpace?), Google wasn't the first search engine, and Instagram definitely wasn't the first photo-sharing app.

The truth is, being second gives you a massive advantage that most people overlook. You get to learn from someone elses mistakes without spending your own money on them. You can see what users love and what frustrates them. You know what features are actually getting used versus what sounded good in a pitch deck but nobody cares about in practice.

When the first app in a category launches, they're essentially doing expensive market research for everyone who follows. They're the ones figuring out which messaging works, what price points users will accept, and which user interface patterns make sense for this particular problem. Meanwhile, you get to observe all of this—its like having a free consultant showing you the ropes.

I mean, think about it this way; if there's already a successful app in your space, that's actually proof that the market exists and people are willing to pay for a solution. That's valuable information. The worst position to be in isn't second or third—it's first in a category that doesn't actually have enough demand to sustain a business. Trust me, I've seen plenty of "pioneering" apps that failed simply because they were solving a problem nobody really had. Before you launch, it's worth checking if your app idea might be too early for the market to embrace.

Being second means you enter a validated market with the knowledge of what works and what doesn't. That's not failure; that's smart business.

Finding Your Market Gap

Here's what most people get wrong about market gaps—they think it means finding a completely untapped audience. But actually, the best gaps exist right inside the markets that are already being served. I've watched countless apps try to create entirely new categories, and you know what? Its exhausting and expensive. Finding your gap isn't about discovering people who need fitness apps or banking apps or whatever;its about finding the specific group whose needs aren't quite being met by the current options.

The trick is to look at what the market leaders are ignoring. Big apps tend to build for the masses, which means they make compromises—they can't be everything to everyone, even though they try. Take task management apps, for example. You've got giants like Todoist and Asana dominating the space, but there's still room for apps built specifically for creative freelancers, or solo parents juggling work and kids, or students with ADHD. Same basic function, completely different approach to solving the problem. This is where identifying your app's direct and indirect rivals becomes crucial to understanding the landscape.

Start by really digging into user reviews of your competitors. I mean really reading them, not just skimming. Look for patterns in what people complain about—too complicated, missing a specific feature, doesn't work for their workflow. Those complaints are gold because they tell you exactly where the gaps are. One client I worked with found their entire positioning strategy by noticing that users of the leading app kept saying it was "too corporate" and they wanted something more personal. That became their whole angle.

Spend at least two hours reading 1-star and 2-star reviews of your top three competitors. The things people hate most are often the things they'd pay someone else to fix.

But here's the thing—you need to pick a gap that's big enough to matter but small enough that the leaders won't bother chasing you into it. If you find a problem that affects millions of users, the big players will eventually notice and squash you. Find something that matters deeply to maybe 100,000 people instead. That's your sweet spot for a late market entry.

Building on What Already Works

Here's the thing—when you enter a market where competitors already exist, you've actually got a massive advantage that most people overlook. You get to see what works and what doesnt. I mean, your competitors have already spent thousands (sometimes millions) testing different features, UI patterns, and user flows. They've made mistakes so you dont have to.

The smart approach? Study the apps that are winning in your space. Download them. Use them daily. Pay attention to which features you use most and which ones you forget about after the first week. Look at their app store reviews—thats where users tell you exactly what they wish the app would do differently. Its basically free market research handed to you on a silver platter.

What to Look For in Successful Competitors

Start by identifying the core features that every successful app in your category has. These are table stakes now; if you launch without them, users will immediately notice and probably uninstall. But here's where it gets interesting—once you've identified whats working, think about how you can do it better or differently.

• Core functionality that users expect as standard
• UI patterns that people have learned to navigate easily
• Onboarding flows that actually get users to their "aha moment" quickly
• Monetisation strategies that feel fair to users
• Features that get mentioned repeatedly in positive reviews

Making Improvements, Not Just Copies

The goal isnt to clone whats out there. Actually, thats the worst thing you could do. Instead, take what works and refine it based on your specific users needs. Maybe the leading app has great functionality but terrible performance on older devices—thats your opportunity. Or perhaps their design looks dated and confusing to new users who arent tech-savvy.

I've seen this work brilliantly across different categories; apps that come to market later but learn from existing solutions often end up with cleaner code, better architecture, and fewer legacy issues holding them back. You're building on a foundation of proven concepts, which means you can move faster and with more confidence than the first movers ever could.

Creating Your Unique Value Proposition

Right, so you've done your research—you know where the gaps are and you understand what the competition is doing wrong. Now comes the tricky bit: actually defining what makes your app different. And I mean genuinely different, not just "we have better customer service" different, because lets be honest, everyone says that.

Your value proposition needs to be something people can understand in about five seconds. Maybe less. I've seen so many apps fail because their founders couldn't explain what made them special without using a dozen buzzwords and a twenty-minute presentation. If you can't sum up your apps unique angle in one clear sentence, you're going to struggle when it comes to marketing and user acquisition; its that simple really. Creating a distinctive app value proposition requires focus and clarity above all else.

The strongest value propositions focus on solving one specific problem better than anyone else, rather than trying to be everything to everyone

Here's what works: pick one thing your competitors aren't doing well and make that your focus. Maybe existing fitness apps are too complicated, so yours is dead simple to use. Maybe dating apps ignore people over 50, so yours is built specifically for that demographic. The key is being specific enough that people immediately understand who you're for and why you're different.

Don't try to compete on features alone—that's a losing game when you're entering late. The established players will always have more resources to add features than you do. Instead, think about the experience you're creating, the specific audience you're serving, or the problem you're solving in a completely different way. That's your competitive differentiation right there, and that's what will actually make people choose your app over one thats been around for years.

Targeting Underserved Users

Here's what most app developers miss when they're entering a crowded market—they try to compete for everyone's attention when they should be looking for the people nobody else is serving properly. I mean, its basic business sense really, but you'd be surprised how many apps launch trying to be everything to everyone and end up being nothing to anyone.

When I'm working on positioning for a new app, I spend a lot of time looking at the reviews of competing apps. Not just the five-star ones, but particularly the one and two-star reviews. Why? Because that's where you find gold—actual users telling you exactly what their problems are and what the current solutions aren't doing well. One app I built for the fitness space came about because we noticed hundreds of reviews from older users saying they felt intimidated by all the advanced features and gym-focused content. We built something simpler, with exercises they could do at home, and it found its audience immediately.

The thing is, underserved doesn't always mean a small group. Sometimes it means a massive audience that's been overlooked because they don't fit the "ideal user" profile that competitors designed for. Look at how many apps ignored accessibility features for years—they were basically ignoring millions of potential users. When developers started building with screen readers, colour contrast, and alternative input methods in mind from the start, they opened up entirely new markets.

Think about demographics too; age groups, income levels, technical confidence, language preferences, even location-based needs. If you're launching a banking app and everyone else is targeting tech-savvy millennials, maybe there's a huge opportunity in serving people who find existing banking apps too complicated? The users are there waiting—you just need to actually listen to what they need rather than copying what already exists.

Learning from Competitor Mistakes

Here's the thing—when you enter a market late, you get to watch everyone else trip over themselves first. Its basically like having a cheat sheet for an exam. I've seen so many apps make the same mistakes over and over, and honestly, it never stops surprising me how often new entrants repeat them instead of learning from them. But you? You're going to be smarter about this.

The apps that came before you have already done the hard work of figuring out what doesn't work. They've annoyed users, confused them, charged too much or too little, and built features nobody asked for. All of this is valuable intelligence if you know where to look. Start by reading their app store reviews—not just the five-star ones, but especially the one and two-star reviews. Thats where people tell you exactly what's broken. You'll spot patterns quickly; maybe the onboarding is too complicated, maybe a key feature is hidden behind too many taps, or maybe the pricing structure just doesn't make sense to people.

I mean, look at how many food delivery apps made the mistake of requiring full registration before users could even browse menus? That drove people away in droves until someone finally figured out that letting people explore first converts better. Or think about fitness apps that bombarded users with notifications every single day until people just deleted them. These aren't small mistakes—they're the kind that cost millions in user acquisition spending. When you're working with developers, make sure you choose an app developer who won't hurt your brand by repeating these common errors.

What to Look For

When you're analysing competitor mistakes, focus on these specific areas where apps typically fail:

• Overcomplicated onboarding that takes more than 2-3 screens
• Asking for permissions (location, notifications, camera) before users understand why they need them
• Features that users consistently say are missing in reviews
• Pricing complaints—too expensive, confusing subscription tiers, or unexpected charges
• Performance issues like crashes, slow loading times, or battery drain
• Poor customer support response times or unhelpful automated responses

Actually, one of the biggest mistakes I see established apps make is getting complacent. They stop listening to their users because they already have market share. This creates a massive opportunity for you as a late market entry; you can be the app that actually listens and responds. When users feel heard, they become your biggest advocates.

Turn Their Weaknesses Into Your Strengths

Once you've identified what competitors are doing wrong, the next step is making sure your app does those things right from day one. If their app is slow to load, make speed your priority. If they ignore user feedback, build a reputation for being responsive. If their interface is cluttered, make yours clean and focused. This is your market positioning advantage—you get to be the solution to problems that already exist.

But here's where people get it wrong; don't just avoid their mistakes, actively promote the fact that you've solved these problems. If competitor apps have terrible customer support, make exceptional support part of your unique value proposition. If they're expensive, position yourself as the affordable alternative that doesn't compromise on quality. Your competitive differentiation comes from being deliberate about addressing the gaps they've left open.

Set up Google Alerts for your main competitors and check their app store reviews weekly. When you spot a common complaint appearing repeatedly, thats your signal that users are ready for an alternative that fixes that specific problem. This is second mover advantage in action—you get to build what the market is already asking for.

The beautiful thing about following a follower strategy based on competitor mistakes is that it's low-risk. You're not guessing what users might want; you're responding to what they've already told other apps they need. They've done the expensive market research for you—all you need to do is pay attention and deliver on what they couldn't.

Marketing When You're the New Option

Right, so you've built your app and now comes the hard part—getting people to actually download it when theres already a popular option sitting at the top of the search results. Its a bit mad really, because most marketing advice assumes you're either first or you have unlimited budget to compete. But here's the thing—you can market successfully as the newcomer if you're smart about it.

Target the Frustrated Users First

I've found that the best starting point is focusing on users who are already frustrated with the market leader. They're actively looking for alternatives; they just need to find you. This means your app store description needs to speak directly to those pain points—if the leading app has terrible customer service, make yours prominent. If they're expensive, make your pricing clear upfront. These users convert quickly because they're already halfway out the door from your competitor.

Your reviews section becomes your secret weapon here. Reply to every single review (good or bad) with genuine, helpful responses. When potential users compare apps, they look at how developers interact with their community, and seeing active engagement makes a massive difference in their decision.

Go Where Your Competitors Aren't

The big players focus on broad marketing channels—paid search, TV ads, influencer campaigns. You can't compete there on budget, so don't try. Instead, find the niche communities where your specific target users hang out. Reddit threads, Facebook groups, Discord servers, industry forums...these places are goldmines for reaching engaged users who are actually interested in what you offer.

Content marketing works brilliantly for newer apps because it builds trust without requiring huge ad spend. Write helpful blog posts that solve real problems your target users face (not just posts about your app). Make tutorial videos. Answer questions on social media. This positions you as experts who care about helping people, not just making sales. One strategy that works particularly well is repurposing your app content across different platforms to maximise your reach without creating everything from scratch.

User acquisition costs are high, I'm not going to pretend otherwise. But when you focus on targeted channels where your ideal users already are, you spend less and get better quality downloads. Quality beats quantity every time—100 engaged users who love your app are worth more than 10,000 downloads that never open it again.

Here are the marketing tactics that actually work when you're the new option:

• Offer a genuinely better free tier than competitors to let users test without risk
• Create comparison content that honestly shows where you excel (and where you don't)
• Partner with micro-influencers in your niche who have engaged audiences
• Run referral programmes that reward existing users for bringing friends
• Focus on one or two channels and do them properly rather than spreading yourself thin
• Use retargeting to bring back users who visited your website but didn't download
• Build an email list early so you're not entirely dependent on paid channels

And look—your first 1,000 users won't come from clever marketing tactics. They'll come from you doing things that don't scale: personally reaching out, joining conversations, helping people solve problems whether they use your app or not. It's exhausting, honestly, but it builds a foundation of users who genuinely care about your success and will advocate for you. Getting started early with building an email list before your app launches can give you that crucial first group of engaged users.

Look, being second to market isn't the end of the world—its actually where most successful apps find themselves. I've built apps that entered crowded markets and went on to do really well, not because they were first, but because they were better for specific people. The key is understanding that late market entry doesn't mean you've lost; it means you have information your competitors didn't have when they started.

Your positioning strategy needs to be honest about what you are and what you're not. Don't try to be everything to everyone because that's a race you cant win against established players with bigger budgets. Instead, focus on being exceptional for a specific group of users who aren't being served properly right now. That's your second mover advantage—you can see exactly where the gaps are.

The follower strategy that works best? Build on what's already proven to work, then add something genuinely useful that nobody else is doing. I mean, it sounds simple but most apps get this wrong...they either copy too much or try to reinvent everything from scratch. Neither approach works. You need that balance between familiar and better.

Market positioning comes down to making a choice about who you're for and what problem you solve better than anyone else. Once you've made that choice, everything becomes clearer—your features, your design, your marketing, your pricing. It all flows from understanding your place in the market.

Here's the thing about competitive differentiation: it doesn't have to be massive. Sometimes its just doing one thing really well whilst your competitors are trying to do ten things poorly. Sometimes its better customer service. Sometimes its just explaining things in a way people actually understand. Whatever it is, make sure its something your target users actually care about, not just something that sounds good in a pitch deck.

You've got this. Seriously. Being second means you're playing smart, not catching up.

Frequently Asked Questions