Should I Soft Launch My App Before the Big Release?
What if I told you that most app failures could have been avoided with just a few weeks of proper testing? Look, I've been developing apps for over eight years now, and one question I get asked constantly is whether launching an app to a small group before going global is actually worth the effort. The short answer is usually yes—but here's the thing, its not always necessary and it definitely isnt as simple as just releasing your app in New Zealand and calling it a day.
The whole idea behind a soft launch strategy is pretty straightforward really; you release your app to a limited audience in specific test markets before your big worldwide release. Sounds simple. But the execution? That's where most people mess it up. I mean, I've seen clients skip this step entirely and launch globally only to discover their onboarding flow confuses 80% of users... or worse, their payment system doesn't work properly in half their target countries. Its a bit mad really how much money gets wasted because people are too eager to launch.
Pre-launch testing in real markets tells you what your users actually do, not what they say they'll do in surveys or focus groups
The mobile app space has changed dramatically over the years—user acquisition costs have gone through the roof and app store algorithms now factor in things like retention rates and crash reports when deciding which apps to promote. This means you cant afford to launch a buggy app anymore; the cost of getting it wrong is just too high. A proper app release strategy that includes beta launch planning can be the difference between an app that scales successfully and one that burns through its entire marketing budget in the first month with nothing to show for it. And honestly? That's exactly why we need to talk about soft launches properly, because getting this right sets the foundation for everything that comes after.
What Actually Is a Soft Launch?
Right, let's clear this up because I've had clients use "soft launch" to describe all sorts of things—and half the time they're talking about completely different approaches. A soft launch is basically when you release your app to a limited audience before rolling it out everywhere. That's it. Nothing fancy.
Think of it this way: instead of launching your app in every country on day one, you pick maybe one or two smaller markets and release it there first. Could be New Zealand, could be the Philippines, could be Canada. The point is you're testing your app with real users, real money (if its a paid app), and real usage patterns—but without risking your entire reputation if something goes wrong.
Here's what a soft launch gives you that internal testing cant: actual user behaviour in the wild. Beta testing with friends and colleagues is useful, sure, but those people know you. They're invested in helping you succeed. Real users? They don't care about your feelings. They'll delete your app in seconds if it doesn't work properly or if they dont understand what they're supposed to do.
What Happens During a Soft Launch
During this phase you're watching everything like a hawk—crash rates, user retention, session length, where people drop off in your onboarding flow. You're also testing your monetisation model if you have one. Do people actually pay for premium features? Are your ad placements annoying enough that people uninstall? These are things you need to know before you spend thousands on marketing.
Different Types of Soft Launch
Not all soft launches look the same, honestly. Some companies do a geographical soft launch where they pick specific countries. Others do a phased rollout where they gradually increase the percentage of users who can access the app. There's also the "friends and family" approach, though I wouldn't really call that a proper soft launch—its more like extended beta testing.
- Geographic soft launch: Release in one or two countries first
- Percentage rollout: Gradually increase how many people can download it
- Feature-limited release: Launch with basic features, add more later
- Invite-only launch: Control exactly who gets access initially
The key difference between a soft launch and just "launching quietly" is that you're actively gathering data and making improvements. You're not just hoping people find your app—you're learning from how they use it so you can fix problems before your big launch.
Why Most Apps Need Testing in Real Markets
Right, so here's the thing—no matter how much internal testing you do, your team is never going to use your app the way real people will. I mean, you've been building this thing for months, you know every feature inside out, you know the workarounds for the little quirks. Real users? They don't have a clue, and that's exactly why you need them.
I've watched perfectly functioning apps completely fall apart when they hit real users because the developers never considered how someone would actually interact with it in the wild. Maybe your user is on a dodgy 3G connection on their commute. Maybe they're trying to sign up while walking their dog. Maybe they've got a hundred other apps fighting for their phones storage and your app is the one that gets the boot because its too slow to load.
Pre-launch testing in real markets gives you something you absolutely cannot get from your internal QA team or even a closed beta—unbiased feedback from people who have no reason to be nice to you. These users will tell you (sometimes quite brutally) if your onboarding is confusing, if your core feature isn't solving their problem, or if your app just feels...off somehow.
But here's what really matters—you get to see your retention numbers. Sure, people might download your app, but do they come back the next day? The next week? If you're seeing a massive drop-off after Day 1, you've got a problem that needs fixing before you spend thousands on user acquisition. Testing in real markets lets you iterate on these issues when the stakes are low and your budget isn't blown.
Start your testing in markets similar to your target audience but where failure won't damage your main launch. If you're targeting the UK, consider testing in Australia or New Zealand first—similar language and behaviours but different enough that bad press wont carry over.
The data you collect during real market testing is worth its weight in gold. You'll discover which acquisition channels actually convert, which features people love (and which ones they ignore completely), and what your actual cost per install looks like. All of this helps you build a proper app release strategy instead of just guessing and hoping for the best.
Choosing Your Test Markets and Target Audience
Right, so you've decided to do a soft launch—now comes the tricky bit. Where do you actually test your app? I mean, you can't just throw it out everywhere and hope for the best. That defeats the whole purpose of testing in the first place.
The key is to pick markets that are similar enough to your main target audience but small enough that any mistakes you make wont completely destroy your apps reputation before you even get started. Makes sense, right?
What Makes a Good Test Market
I typically look for countries that have decent App Store visibility but aren't your primary market. Australia, New Zealand, Canada—these are all solid choices because they're English-speaking markets with users who behave similarly to UK and US audiences. The Philippines is brilliant for testing too; it's got a massive mobile-first population and its way cheaper to acquire users there.
But here's the thing—you need to think about what you're actually testing. If your app is heavy on in-app purchases, pick a market where people actually spend money on apps. If its ad-supported, you need markets with decent ad fill rates. Testing a payments app in a market with completely different banking infrastructure? That's not going to give you useful data, is it.
Getting Your Audience Right
Your test audience should mirror your real audience as closely as possible. If you're building a fitness app for women aged 25-40, don't test it exclusively with university students just because they're easier to reach. You'll get rubbish data that won't help you when you launch properly.
Here's what I recommend you nail down before picking your test markets:
- Age range and demographics of your primary users
- Device preferences (iPhone vs Android splits matter more than you think)
- Economic profile—can they afford subscriptions or in-app purchases
- Cultural differences that might affect how they use your app
- Language requirements and localisation needs
- Internet connectivity patterns in different regions
One mistake I see constantly is people testing in markets that are too different from their target. You launch in India to test a premium subscription model, but Indian users have completely different price sensitivities than UK users—suddenly all your pricing data is useless. Or worse, you test in the US first because "it's the biggest market" and blow your entire marketing budget before you've even fixed the obvious bugs.
Start small, start smart, and pick markets where failure wont kill your launch before it begins. Trust me on this one; I've seen too many apps get it wrong and regret it later.
Setting Up Your Soft Launch the Right Way
Right, so you've decided to do a soft launch—now comes the practical bit. And honestly, this is where I see loads of people get a bit confused about what they actually need to do. The setup phase isn't complicated, but you do need to be methodical about it or you'll end up with data that's basically useless.
First thing: get your analytics properly configured before you launch anything. I mean it—do this first. You need to have your tracking events set up so you know exactly what users are doing from the moment they open your app. Its not enough to just have Google Analytics installed; you need to be tracking specific user actions, drop-off points, and the whole user journey. I typically recommend setting up event tracking for every major interaction: sign-ups, core feature usage, payment flows if you've got them, and crucially, where people are leaving your app.
Next, you'll want to set up your beta launch planning with TestFlight for iOS and a closed track on Google Play for Android. Both platforms let you release to specific regions without affecting your app's main store presence, which is exactly what you need. Choose your test markets carefully—don't just pick countries at random. Look for markets that match your target demographic but won't burn through your entire marketing budget. Countries like New Zealand, Philippines, or Poland work well because they have good mobile penetration but lower acquisition costs than the US or UK.
The biggest mistake in pre-launch testing is launching without clear success criteria—you need to know what numbers would make you confident enough to proceed with a full release.
Set your target numbers before you start. What retention rate would make you happy? What's an acceptable cost per install? What engagement metrics would signal that people actually want to use your app? Write these down. Seriously. Because once you're knee-deep in data, its really easy to convince yourself that mediocre numbers are actually fine when they're not.
Budget-wise, you don't need to spend a fortune. I've run successful soft launches with as little as £1,000-2,000 in paid acquisition, just enough to get a few hundred users through the door and see how they behave. The goal isn't massive scale—it's learning what works and what doesn't before you commit serious money to your app release strategy.
What Metrics You Should Actually Track
Right, so you've got your soft launch running and data is starting to come in. The problem? Theres about a million different metrics you could track and honestly most of them are just noise. I've seen teams obsess over vanity metrics that look impressive but tell you absolutely nothing about whether your app will succeed or not.
Here's what actually matters—and I mean really matters, not just looks good in a presentation. First up is your Day 1 retention. If people download your app and never come back the next day, you've got a fundamental problem with either your onboarding or your core value proposition. Simple as that. Then look at Day 7 and Day 30 retention; these numbers tell you if you're building genuine habits or just getting one-time users who forget you exist.
Your crash rate needs to be under 1% really, anything higher and you're bleeding users before they even experience what your app does. App store ratings matter too but not in the way you think—its not about getting 5 stars, its about understanding why people are frustrated. Read the 1-star reviews obsessively; they're basically free user research.
The Numbers That Actually Predict Success
Session length and frequency show you if people find your app valuable enough to keep using. But here's the thing—what "good" looks like depends entirely on your app type. A meditation app should have daily sessions; a mortgage calculator probably won't. Context matters more than benchmarks.
Time to first key action is massive. How long does it take new users to do the thing your app promises? If its more than 60 seconds you're probably losing people. I always track where users drop off in the onboarding flow too—that tells you exactly where your experience breaks down.
Metrics That Tell You About Growth Potential
Look at your acquisition channels and their quality, not just quantity. 1000 users from paid ads might perform totally different than 1000 from organic search. Track cost per install sure, but also track cost per retained user—that second number is what actually matters for your business model.
And honestly? Track how many users give you permission for push notifications. That single metric tells you volumes about trust and engagement. If people don't trust you enough to let you back into their pocket, you've got work to do before any full launch.
- Day 1, Day 7, and Day 30 retention rates
- Crash rate and technical performance metrics
- Time to complete first key action
- Onboarding completion rate and drop-off points
- Session frequency and length
- User acquisition cost by channel
- Push notification opt-in rate
- App store rating trends and review themes
Common Soft Launch Mistakes That Cost Time and Money
Right, let's talk about the stuff that goes wrong—because honestly, I see these same mistakes over and over again. The thing is, a soft launch is supposed to save you money and time, but if you mess it up, you'll end up spending more of both than if you'd just gone straight to full release. Its frustrating to watch.
The biggest mistake? Testing in markets that dont represent your actual target audience. I mean, sure, launching in a small country with cheap user acquisition costs sounds smart on paper, but if the demographics are completely different to your main market, what are you actually learning? If you're building a fintech app for the UK market, testing exclusively in a country with completely different banking behaviours wont tell you much—you'll just end up with data that doesn't apply when you do your real launch.
What Actually Goes Wrong
Here's what I see happening most often:
- Launching without proper analytics set up first, so you cant track what users are actually doing in your app
- Not running the soft launch long enough to get meaningful data; you need at least 2-3 weeks minimum
- Ignoring qualitative feedback because you're only focused on the numbers—sometimes users tell you exactly whats wrong
- Testing too many variables at once, so you dont know which changes actually made a difference
- Skipping proper server load testing and then crashing when you scale up to full release
- Not having a clear definition of what "success" looks like before you start, which means you dont know when to proceed
Another problem—and this ones a bit mad really—is when teams treat the soft launch like its a finished product. It's not. You're supposed to be learning and iterating quickly. If you discover your onboarding flow is confusing, fix it straight away...don't wait until the full release because "we've already designed it this way." The whole point of doing a beta launch planning phase is to find these issues early.
Set clear success criteria before your soft launch starts. Write down exactly what metrics need to hit what numbers for you to proceed with full release. This stops endless debate later about whether you're "ready" or not.
The Money Pit Problem
Some teams spend ages perfecting their soft launch, constantly tweaking and testing, but never actually pulling the trigger on the full release. I've seen app testing markets drag on for months beyond what was needed. At some point you need to accept that you've learned what you can learn and its time to move forward; otherwise your pre-launch testing just becomes an expensive holding pattern that burns through budget without getting you closer to your actual goal.
When to Skip the Soft Launch Completely
Right, lets talk about when you really don't need a soft launch—because honestly, not every app needs one. I've seen plenty of clients waste weeks or even months preparing for a soft launch that didn't actually serve their goals, and its frustrating to watch.
If you're building a simple utility app that does one thing really well, you probably don't need a soft launch. These apps are straightforward enough that thorough internal testing and a decent beta programme will catch most issues. Think calculator apps, note-taking tools, or basic conversion utilities. The user journey is short. The features are clear. There's not much to test in terms of behaviour patterns.
Apps targeting a very specific local market should usually skip the soft launch too. If you're building an app for London commuters or Manchester restaurants, testing it in New Zealand or Canada won't give you useful data—the audience is just too different. You're better off doing a controlled beta with actual users from your target area and then launching properly.
When Speed Matters More Than Perfection
Sometimes being first matters more than being perfect. If you're in a rapidly moving market where competitors are launching similar products, a soft launch might cost you your window of opportunity. Sure, you might have a few bugs at launch, but being there early can be more valuable than being there perfectly.
B2B apps often don't benefit from soft launches either; your target users are usually a small, defined group who you can reach directly through other channels. A pilot programme with a handful of clients will give you better feedback than a public soft launch ever could.
Finally—and this is important—if you haven't got the budget or team capacity to properly analyse soft launch data and make changes based on what you learn, dont bother. A soft launch that you can't act on is just a waste of time and money. Better to launch properly and iterate based on real user feedback than to half-heartedly test in markets you're not committed to.
Making the Jump from Soft Launch to Full Release
Right, so you've run your soft launch, collected your data, and fixed the biggest issues—now comes the scary part. When do you actually pull the trigger on the full release? I mean, its easy to get stuck in analysis paralysis here, constantly tweaking and testing while your competitors race ahead. But here's the thing—you need to set clear success criteria before you even start your soft launch.
Most of the successful apps I've built hit full release when they meet three basic conditions: retention rate above 30% after day 7, crash rate below 1%, and a clear understanding of which acquisition channels actually work. Notice I didn't say perfection? Because you'll never get there. There will always be one more feature to add, one more bug to squash. The question is whether your app solves its core problem well enough that people keep coming back.
The difference between a successful soft launch and a failed one isn't how perfect your app becomes, its whether you learned enough to make smart decisions about your full release strategy
Your app release strategy should include a proper rollout plan—don't just flip a switch and hope for the best. I usually recommend a phased approach; start with one or two major markets, monitor performance for a week, then expand gradually. This gives you breathing room if something goes wrong (and trust me, something always does). Make sure your support team is ready, your servers can handle increased load, and you've got a marketing plan that goes beyond just "launch and pray". The apps that succeed at this stage are the ones that treat their full release like another test—just a bigger one.
And you know what? If your soft launch metrics are consistently terrible after multiple iterations, it might be time to go back to the drawing board rather than throwing good money after bad. Sometimes the best app release strategy is knowing when to pivot or even walk away.
Conclusion
So here's where we land—soft launching isn't some magic formula that every app needs to follow, but its also not something you should dismiss without proper thought. I've seen apps succeed with soft launches and without them; the key is understanding which approach makes sense for your specific situation, your budget, and what you're actually trying to achieve.
If you're building something complex, something with social features or in-app purchases or mechanics that need real-world validation, then yes a soft launch is probably worth the extra time and effort. You'll catch issues before they become expensive problems, you'll understand your users better, and you'll launch with confidence rather than crossing your fingers and hoping for the best. But if you're building something straightforward, something where the value proposition is clear and the technical risks are low? Maybe skip it and get to market faster.
The thing is, soft launching is just one tool in your toolkit. It doesn't guarantee success and skipping it doesn't guarantee failure. What matters more is that you're thinking strategically about your launch, that you're being honest about your apps strengths and weaknesses, and that you're prepared to respond to what the market tells you—whether that feedback comes during a soft launch phase or after your full release.
Whatever you decide, make sure its a deliberate choice based on your circumstances rather than just following what everyone else seems to be doing. Your app is unique, your situation is unique, and your launch strategy should reflect that. Trust your instincts, but back them up with data whenever possible. And remember that launching is just the beginning; what you do after launch matters just as much as how you get there.
Share this
Subscribe To Our Learning Centre
You May Also Like
These Related Guides

How Long Should My App Pre-Launch Phase Actually Be?

How Do I Find the Perfect App Launch Date?
