What Do Venture Capitalists Want to See in My App?

Venture capital funding represents one of the most common ways that mobile apps secure the investment needed to scale from modest user bases to millions of downloads, but the truth is that most app founders approach this process with some pretty big misconceptions about what investors are looking for. After building apps for over a decade and working closely with founders through their funding journeys (some successful, some not so much), I've seen how the gap between what founders think matters and what VCs actually examine can be the deciding factor in whether you walk away with investment or just polite rejection emails.

The average VC reviews around 200 funding applications for every single investment they make, which means your app needs to stand out in very specific ways

Getting venture capital for your app isn't about having the flashiest features or the most downloads, it's about demonstrating that you understand your market, your users, and the path to making serious money. VCs invest in maybe 1-2% of the apps they see, so understanding exactly what they're looking for gives you a much better chance of being in that tiny group.

The Numbers VCs Actually Care About

The metrics that matter to venture capitalists are quite different from the vanity numbers that most app founders get excited about, and I've watched founders proudly present download counts only to see investors glaze over because downloads alone tell almost nothing about your app's real value. What VCs want to see is unit economics that make sense, which means they're looking at how much it costs you to acquire each user compared to how much money that user generates over their lifetime with your app.

Your customer acquisition cost needs to be substantially lower than your lifetime value. The only problem was that in the early days of an app, these numbers often look terrible because you're still figuring out your channels and your monetisation, but VCs understand this as long as you can show a clear trend towards improvement. This is particularly important when you're working with a limited first year budget for your app, where every pound spent on user acquisition needs to demonstrate clear returns.

Monthly recurring revenue matters far more than total downloads because it shows predictable income that can scale. User retention rates tell investors whether you've built something people actually want to keep using or just something they tried once and forgot about.

• Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) - what you spend to get each new user through your app's doors
• Lifetime Value (LTV) - how much revenue each user generates before they stop using your app
• Monthly Active Users (MAU) - the number of people opening your app at least once per month
• Churn Rate - the percentage of users who stop using your app each month
• Monthly Recurring Revenue (MRR) - predictable subscription income that comes in every month

The ratio between LTV and CAC should ideally be at least 3:1, meaning each user generates three times what you spent to acquire them. Payback period (how long it takes to earn back your acquisition cost) should be under 12 months for most consumer apps, though some B2B models can stretch this a bit further.

Building a User Base That Shows Real Growth Potential

VCs look at your existing users to understand whether you can grow to millions, and the composition of your user base matters just as much as its size. A healthcare app we built had just 8,000 users when the founders started seeking investment, but those users were opening the app an average of 4.2 times per week and had been active for an average of seven months, which told a much better story than an app with 80,000 downloads but barely any engagement.

Growth rate is more interesting to investors than absolute numbers at the early stage. They want to see month-over-month growth that's consistent, even if it's modest, because it suggests you've found channels that work and you just need capital to pour more fuel on that fire. Understanding what drives users to install apps from social media can be crucial for demonstrating scalable acquisition channels to potential investors.

Track your cohort retention curves religiously because VCs will ask for them during due diligence, and you want to show that each monthly cohort is retaining better than the last, which proves you're learning and improving your product

The quality of your users matters too, and by quality I mean are they the kind of users who will eventually pay or who represent the market you're targeting. An e-commerce app with 5,000 users who've each made at least one purchase is worth more than a social app with 50,000 users who've never opened their wallets. Many successful apps hit growth plateaus, so it's worth understanding what prevents apps from continuing to grow after initial success.

How VCs Evaluate Your App's Technical Foundation

Investors will dig into your technical setup more than you might expect because they're looking for red flags that could mean expensive rebuilds down the line, and I've seen deals fall apart during technical due diligence when VCs discovered that an app was built on unsustainable architecture or had security gaps that would cost hundreds of thousands to fix. Your technology stack needs to support the scale you're promising, which means if you're telling investors you'll reach a million users but your backend is held together with temporary solutions and prayer, they'll spot that mismatch.

Code quality matters. VCs often bring in technical advisors to review your codebase, looking at things like test coverage, documentation, and whether you've accumulated technical debt that will slow down future development. Before you even start building, make sure you understand the essential questions to ask before writing any code to avoid costly architectural decisions later.

Architecture Decisions

Your choice of technology should match your growth plans and team capabilities. A fintech app we worked on had chosen a particular framework because one developer knew it well, but it couldn't handle the transaction volumes they needed for scale, which became a real problem during investor conversations.

Security and Compliance

Data protection is a big deal now, and VCs know that security breaches can kill companies. Your app needs proper encryption, secure authentication, and compliance with regulations like GDPR if you're targeting European users. For enterprise applications especially, understanding GDPR compliance requirements is essential for building investor confidence.

• Server infrastructure that can scale without complete rewrites
• Database architecture that handles growing data volumes efficiently
• Security measures that protect user data properly
• API design that allows for future integrations and features
• Monitoring and analytics systems that give you visibility into performance

The fact is that technical excellence won't win you funding on its own, but technical problems will definitely lose it for you, so you need your house in order before you start pitching.

The Business Model Question That Every Investor Asks

Every VC will eventually ask how you plan to make money, and surprisingly many app founders stumble over this question because they've been so focused on building features and growing users that they haven't really thought through the economics. The business model you choose shapes everything about your app, from how you design features to which users you target, and I guess what strikes me is how many founders treat monetisation as something they'll figure out later rather than as a core part of their strategy.

Subscription models have become the preferred monetisation approach for VCs because they create predictable recurring revenue that's easier to value and scale

Subscription revenue is attractive to investors because it's predictable and because it aligns your interests with keeping users happy long-term, but it only works if your app delivers ongoing value that justifies the monthly fee. Transaction-based models (taking a percentage of payments processed through your app) can work brilliantly if you're in the right market, like e-commerce or services marketplaces. If you're implementing in-app purchases, understanding proper IAP setup that passes review can save you months of delays when investors are waiting for revenue validation.

Advertising revenue has fallen out of favour with many VCs unless you can demonstrate really massive user numbers, because the CPMs (cost per thousand impressions) have dropped while user acquisition costs have risen, making the math difficult. Freemium models can work but you need to show that your conversion rate from free to paid is at least 2-3%, otherwise the unit economics don't make sense.

Revenue Projections That Make Sense

VCs want to see financial projections that are ambitious but believable, based on your current metrics and reasonable assumptions about growth. If you've got 10,000 users now and 5% are paying subscribers at £4.99 per month, don't project that you'll suddenly hit 50% conversion next quarter without explaining exactly how.

Why Market Timing and Competition Matter More Than You Think

The market opportunity you're addressing needs to be big enough to interest VCs who are looking for investments that could return 10x or more on their money, which typically means you need to be going after a market worth at least £500 million or ideally several billion. Market timing is something that founders underestimate, but I've seen great apps fail to get funding simply because they were too early or too late to their particular market moment.

Being too early means educating users about why they need your solution, which is expensive and slow. Being too late means fighting established competitors with big budgets and user bases. Understanding why startup apps fail can help you position your app to avoid common market timing mistakes that investors immediately recognise.

Competition isn't automatically bad, actually it can validate that there's a real market, but you need a clear story about why users will choose your app over alternatives. The education app space is kind of crowded, but we worked with a team who focused specifically on trade skills training, which was underserved compared to academic subjects, and that specificity made their competitive position much stronger.

Your Competitive Advantage

VCs want to understand what makes your app defensible, meaning what stops bigger companies from just copying your best features and crushing you with their marketing budgets. Network effects (where your app gets more valuable as more people use it) are powerful. Proprietary data or content can work. Brand and community sometimes create moats.

Creating a Pitch Deck That Demonstrates Your App's Value

Your pitch deck is usually the first detailed look a VC gets at your app, and it needs to tell a clear story that moves logically from the problem you've identified through to why your team is the right one to build this solution. Most pitch decks I've reviewed have been either too vague (lots of big claims without supporting data) or too detailed (drowning investors in feature lists and technical specifications that don't matter at this stage).

The structure that tends to work starts with the problem you're solving, explained in a way that makes investors immediately understand why it matters. Then you show your solution, but focus on the benefits and results rather than listing features. Consider creating a prototype that tests your core assumptions before approaching investors, as this demonstrates validation beyond just concepts.

1. Problem - what pain point exists and how big is it
2. Solution - your app and why it addresses the problem better
3. Market Size - how many potential users and what's the revenue opportunity
4. Business Model - specifically how you make money
5. Traction - the metrics and growth you've achieved so far
6. Competition - who else is in this space and why you're different
7. Team - why you're the right people to execute this vision
8. Financials - realistic projections for the next three years
9. Ask - how much you're raising and what you'll use it for

Keep your pitch deck to 12-15 slides maximum because VCs review dozens of these and you need to respect their time while still covering the key points they need to make a decision

Visuals matter more than you might think, not because VCs are superficial but because a well-designed deck suggests attention to detail and user experience, which are the same qualities that make good apps. Screenshots should show your app actually working, not just pretty mockups.

The Due Diligence Process and What VCs Will Investigate

Once a VC is seriously interested, they'll begin due diligence which is basically a thorough investigation of everything you've told them to verify it's true and uncover any problems you haven't mentioned. This process can take anywhere from a few weeks to several months depending on the size of the investment and the complexity of your business, and it's where deals sometimes fall apart when investors find discrepancies between what was pitched and what actually exists.

Financial due diligence means they'll want to see your accounts, your revenue data, your cost breakdowns and your projections with the assumptions behind them. Legal due diligence covers your company structure, any contracts you've signed, intellectual property ownership, and whether you've got any disputes or liabilities lurking. Make sure you understand common IP mistakes that kill app businesses before this stage, as these issues can derail deals quickly.

Technical Review

A technical expert (often someone the VC brings in) will review your codebase, your infrastructure, your security practices and your development processes. They're checking whether you've built something that can actually scale and whether there are technical time bombs that could blow up later.

Market Validation

VCs will talk to your users, your partners, and people in your industry to validate your claims about market size and demand. They might survey your user base or commission market research to verify the opportunity is as big as you've said.

Reference checks on your team are standard, and investors will speak to people you've worked with before to understand your capabilities and working style. Be prepared for them to find and speak to people you haven't listed as references because they want unfiltered opinions.

Common Mistakes That Kill App Funding Deals

The mistakes I've seen founders make repeatedly usually fall into a few categories, and many of them are completely avoidable if you just know what to watch out for. Overvaluing your company is probably the most common deal-killer because founders get emotionally attached to a number that doesn't reflect market reality, and VCs simply walk away rather than negotiate when the gap is too wide.

The relationship between founders matters more to VCs than most people realise because they know that co-founder disputes are one of the top reasons startups fail

Unclear ownership structures or equity arrangements cause problems during due diligence, particularly when founders haven't properly documented who owns what or when there are verbal agreements that were never formalised. A fintech startup we knew lost their funding because one of the early team members claimed they'd been promised equity that wasn't in writing, and the VC didn't want to inherit that dispute. Building a sustainable development culture in your team early can prevent many of these relationship issues before they become deal-breakers.

Being defensive when investors ask hard questions is a red flag because it suggests you can't handle feedback or that you're hiding something. VCs are testing how you think and how you respond to challenges, not just gathering information.

Missing the Market Opportunity

Going after a market that's too small to generate venture-scale returns means you'll get rejected no matter how good your app is, because VCs have a specific return profile they need to achieve for their fund to work. If your total addressable market is £50 million, you can probably build a nice business but it won't interest most VCs.

Weak Unit Economics

Spending £25 to acquire users who generate £15 in lifetime value is a path to bankruptcy, not success, and no amount of story-telling will convince investors that this makes sense unless you can clearly demonstrate how those numbers will flip.

Ignoring cash flow is something that particularly hurts subscription apps, because even if your lifetime value eventually exceeds your acquisition cost, you might run out of money before you get there if you're paying for users upfront but collecting revenue monthly over two years.

Moving Forward With Your Funding Journey

Getting venture capital for your app is definitely achievable if you approach it with realistic expectations and proper preparation, understanding that VCs are looking for specific signals about your market opportunity, your traction, your team and your business model. The apps that successfully raise funding are the ones that can demonstrate genuine user demand backed up by solid metrics, a clear path to making money, and a team that can execute on an ambitious vision without needing their hands held through every decision.

Focus on building a product that solves a real problem for a specific group of users, prove that those users will pay for your solution, and create growth channels that can scale with investment. The funding will follow if those fundamentals are in place.

If you need support developing an app that's built for investment readiness or want to talk through your funding strategy, get in touch with us and we'll be happy to share what we've learned from working with founders through this process.

Frequently Asked Questions