How Do I Plan Costs for an App That Uses AI?

A property app developer launched what seemed like a straightforward rental platform last year, but they wanted to add a feature that could automatically value properties based on uploaded photos and neighbourhood data. The original budget was seventy-five grand for the whole project, but when they started looking at what the AI component would actually require (the processing power, the data storage, the specialist knowledge needed to make it work properly), they realised they'd need to triple that figure just for the AI portion alone. It happens more often than you'd think, mainly because AI sounds like a single feature when in reality it's a collection of moving parts that all need feeding and maintaining.

The cost difference between adding a simple search function and implementing AI that learns from user behaviour can be anywhere from twenty to fifty thousand pounds in the first year alone

After building apps for over a decade, I've watched AI move from being something only tech giants could afford to something every client meeting mentions at least once (learned that the hard way when I started charging flat rates). The problem is that planning costs for AI features requires a completely different approach to traditional app budgeting, because you're not just paying for development time, you're paying for computation, data, ongoing training, and a team with skills that command premium day rates. Most budget breakdowns I see treat AI as another feature line item, right between payment integration and push notifications, when it really needs its own category with multiple sub-sections that account for both upfront and recurring expenses.

The Three Types of AI Implementation and Their Cost Differences

The first type is rule-based systems that people often mistake for real machine learning, where you're basically creating a complex set of if-then statements that appear intelligent but don't actually learn anything. These are the cheapest option (usually adding between five and fifteen thousand to your project), but they're not really AI in the modern sense, more like very clever automation that needs manual updating whenever circumstances change.

Pre-trained models represent the middle ground, where you're using existing AI that's already been taught by someone else (companies like OpenAI, Google, or Amazon), and you're just connecting your app to their service through an API. This approach typically costs between fifteen and forty grand to implement, depending on how much customisation you need and what your expected usage volume looks like... the ongoing costs can really vary here.

• Rule-based systems: £5,000-£15,000 upfront, minimal ongoing costs
• Pre-trained API models: £15,000-£40,000 implementation, £200-£2,000 monthly usage fees
• Custom-built models: £50,000-£200,000+ initial development, £1,000-£10,000+ monthly maintenance

Custom machine learning models sit at the expensive end, where you're building and training something specific to your exact needs. I worked on a healthcare diagnosis support app that needed this approach because existing models couldn't handle the specific medical imaging requirements, and the development costs alone came in at around one hundred and eighty grand before we even considered the infrastructure to run it on.

API-Based AI Services Versus Building Your Own Models

Using API services from providers like OpenAI's GPT models or Google's Vision API means you're paying per use rather than building from scratch, which sounds cheaper until you run the numbers on what happens when your app gets popular. A startup I worked with built a content creation tool that cost them about three hundred quid monthly in API fees during testing, but once they launched and got fifteen thousand active users, that jumped to nearly four grand a month because every interaction required an API call.

The break-even point between API costs and building your own model usually sits somewhere around the eighteen-month mark for apps with moderate usage (took me ages to realise this), but it depends heavily on your specific use case and user volume. Building your own model might cost you a hundred and twenty thousand upfront, but if your API fees would run to six or seven thousand monthly, you'd recover that investment within two years whilst gaining complete control over your data and model behaviour. This is where financial forecasting becomes crucial for showing investors the long-term viability of your approach.

Start with API-based services for your first version, then track your usage costs carefully for three months post-launch. If those costs exceed £3,000 monthly and you have consistent usage patterns, start planning the transition to a custom model.

The technical expertise needed differs massively between these approaches too, because connecting to an API might only need a decent full-stack developer who can read documentation, whereas building your own model requires data scientists or machine learning engineers who typically charge between four hundred and seven hundred pounds per day.

Data Requirements and Storage Costs Nobody Talks About

Machine learning models need feeding, and the quality of what you feed them directly impacts how well they perform, which means data collection, cleaning, and storage become major cost centres that most initial budgets completely overlook. I've seen projects that budgeted fifty grand for AI development but forgot to account for the twenty thousand they'd need to spend on acquiring and preparing training data.

Storage costs scale differently with AI applications because you're not just storing user data, you're keeping training datasets, model versions, logs for monitoring performance, and often the raw input data for retraining purposes. A fintech app I worked on started with about two hundred gigabytes of transaction data for their fraud detection model, but within six months they were storing nearly four terabytes because they needed to retain everything for compliance and model improvement purposes.

The fact is that data preparation usually takes longer than the actual model building, sometimes accounting for sixty to seventy percent of the total development time. You need people who understand data quality, can spot biases or errors, and know how to structure information in ways that machine learning algorithms can actually use (crazy when I think about it). Before investing heavily in data preparation, consider testing your concept with smaller datasets to validate the approach works.

Server Infrastructure That Scales With AI Workloads

Running AI features requires substantially more computing power than traditional app functions, particularly if you're doing real-time processing or handling image and video analysis. The difference between hosting a standard app and one with AI capabilities can be anywhere from three to ten times higher on your monthly infrastructure bills.

A simple recommendation engine might add fifty to one hundred pounds monthly to your server costs, whilst real-time image processing could easily push that to a thousand pounds or more

Processing Requirements

GPUs (graphics processing units) have become standard for AI workloads because they can handle the parallel processing that machine learning requires, but they're expensive to rent compared to standard CPU instances. Running a single GPU instance on AWS costs around two quid per hour for basic models, scaling up to fifteen pounds hourly for the powerful units needed for complex tasks like video analysis or natural language processing at scale. When planning infrastructure costs, it's essential to understand how these expenses impact your pricing strategy.

Load Balancing Considerations

AI processing creates unpredictable load patterns because some requests take milliseconds whilst others might need several seconds depending on complexity, which means you need infrastructure that can scale quickly without wasting money on idle capacity. I worked with an education app that processed essay submissions, and they'd see massive spikes every Sunday evening when students uploaded work before Monday deadlines, requiring infrastructure that could scale from two instances to twenty within minutes.

The Hidden Ongoing Costs of Training and Maintaining Models

Models degrade over time as the real world changes around them, which means that AI isn't a build-it-once situation like traditional features... it needs regular retraining to maintain performance. A retail app I built had a recommendation engine that worked brilliantly for about four months, then started suggesting winter coats in summer because it hadn't been retrained on recent seasonal data. Understanding whether your AI features continue to help users becomes crucial for justifying these ongoing maintenance costs.

Retraining costs include the compute time to process new data, the engineering time to monitor performance and decide when retraining is needed, and sometimes the costs of acquiring fresh training data if your app hasn't collected enough organically. Depending on model complexity, you might spend anywhere from five hundred to five thousand pounds each time you retrain, and you might need to do this monthly or quarterly to maintain accuracy.

Monitoring systems need setting up to track model performance in production, because unlike traditional code where a function either works or throws an error, machine learning models can slowly become less accurate without obviously breaking. This monitoring infrastructure typically adds another hundred to three hundred pounds monthly, plus the cost of someone actually reviewing the metrics and deciding when intervention is needed.

Team Composition Changes When AI Enters Your Project

Standard mobile apps need designers, developers, and maybe a backend engineer, but adding AI means bringing in specialists who command premium rates and might only be available on contract rather than as permanent hires. The day rate for a machine learning engineer in the UK typically ranges from four hundred to eight hundred pounds depending on experience and specialism. When considering these costs alongside your overall development budget, you might need to explore different funding sources to cover the additional expertise required.

• Machine learning engineer: £400-£800 per day
• Data scientist: £350-£700 per day
• AI/ML architect: £600-£1,000 per day
• Data engineer: £300-£600 per day

You might not need these people full-time throughout the entire project, but you'll definitely need them during the initial architecture phase, model development, and training periods. A typical three-month AI implementation might need a machine learning engineer for forty days, a data scientist for thirty days, and an architect for ten days of consultation, which alone comes to around fifty grand in specialist costs before your regular development team even starts integration work.

Budget for at least two rounds of specialist involvement, because the first implementation rarely works exactly as planned and you'll need experts to come back and refine the model based on real-world performance data.

The skill overlap between traditional app developers and AI specialists is minimal, which means your existing team probably can't just learn this stuff quickly enough to keep your project on schedule. I've tried that approach (took me ages to realise this), and what should have been a four-month project stretched to nine months because we underestimated how specialised machine learning work really is. This is where demonstrating clear timelines and expertise to funders becomes essential.

Testing AI Features Takes Longer Than Traditional Development

You can't test AI the same way you test traditional features because there's no single correct answer to verify against, instead you're looking at accuracy rates, edge cases, and behaviour patterns across thousands of test scenarios. This means testing periods that might be two weeks for standard features can stretch to six or eight weeks for AI components.

Bias testing has become particularly important (and time-consuming) because models can inadvertently discriminate based on protected characteristics if they're trained on biased data. A lending app I worked on needed extensive bias testing to make sure the credit scoring AI wasn't treating different demographic groups unfairly, which added nearly fifteen grand to the testing budget and pushed the timeline back by a month. This type of comprehensive testing shares similarities with accessibility testing approaches where you need to consider diverse user groups and potential exclusion scenarios.

You need larger test datasets too, because AI behaviour might be fine with a hundred test cases but fall apart with the hundred-and-first that hits an edge case nobody anticipated. Generating or acquiring these test datasets, running the tests, and analysing the results all take time and money that traditional app testing doesn't require... I usually multiply standard testing budgets by 2.5 when AI is involved.

Building a Realistic AI App Budget That Works

Starting with a clear understanding of whether you actually need proper machine learning or whether simpler approaches would solve your problem will save you tens of thousands of pounds, because not every smart feature requires real AI (learned that the hard way on at least three projects). Add twenty-five to forty percent contingency on top of your AI estimates because this technology is less predictable than traditional development, and that uncertainty needs financial buffer. When planning your feature set, remember that starting with too many AI features can quickly spiral costs out of control.

Break your AI features into phases rather than building everything at once, starting with the simplest version that proves the concept works before investing in sophisticated models and infrastructure. A fashion retail client wanted AI that could suggest complete outfits based on a single item, but we started with just showing similar items first, which cost about a fifth of the full vision and let us validate whether users would actually engage with recommendations before spending a hundred and fifty grand on the advanced version. This approach requires careful management of user expectations about upcoming features whilst you build incrementally.

Factor in running costs from day one rather than treating them as a future problem, because AI apps have ongoing expenses that can exceed your hosting costs for traditional features by five to ten times. If your model needs retraining quarterly at three grand per session, that's twelve thousand annually that needs funding from revenue or investment, not just forgotten until it becomes urgent.

If you're planning an app with AI capabilities and want to talk through what a realistic budget might look like for your specific situation, drop us a message and we can walk through the numbers together.

Frequently Asked Questions