How Do I Get Influencers to Talk About My App?

Apps that get significant influencer coverage see their organic download rates jump by 300% or more in the weeks following a post—but here's what most people don't realise: its not about finding the biggest names, its about finding the right voices. I've built apps for healthcare startups that went from 200 downloads a week to 15,000 after a single micro-influencer mentioned them, and I've seen Fortune 500 apps spend £50,000 on celebrity endorsements that generated basically nothing. The difference? One felt genuine and the other felt like an advert.

Getting influencers to talk about your app isn't really about convincing them or pitching them hard—that approach died years ago when influencers started getting hundreds of cold emails every week. What actually works is understanding that influencers are content creators first, and they need material that makes them look good to their audience. I mean, why would someone with 100,000 followers risk their reputation on your app unless it genuinely solves a problem their audience has? They wouldn't. And they don't.

The best influencer partnerships happen when your app becomes a natural part of their content, not an interruption to it

Over the years working with e-commerce apps, fintech platforms, and even education tools, I've learned that successful creator partnerships follow patterns that most developers completely miss. Its not about payment terms or contract length—though those matter. Its about building relationships with people who already talk to your exact target users and giving them something worth sharing. Sure, there are paid promotions and sponsored posts, but the coverage that really moves the needle? That usually comes from creators who genuinely want to tell their audience about what you've built. Getting to that point takes strategy, timing, and honestly... a bit of patience most app developers dont have.

Understanding Why Influencers Matter for App Growth

Look, I'll be straight with you—getting your app in front of real users is bloody expensive these days. When I started building apps, we could get installs for 50p each on Facebook. Now? Try £5-10 depending on your category, and that's just to get someone to download your app once. They might never even open it again. The maths doesn't work for most startups anymore.

This is where influencers actually become useful, and I don't mean hiring some celebrity with millions of followers who've never used an app like yours. I'm talking about finding people whose audience genuinely matches your target users. I worked on a fitness tracking app a while back and we spent ages (and a fair bit of money) on traditional ads with mediocre results. Then we sent the app to a fitness YouTuber with about 80,000 subscribers—not massive by internet standards—and she made a genuine review showing how she used it during her morning routine. Her viewers were already interested in fitness tech, already trusted her opinion, and most importantly, they actually stuck around after installing. Our 30-day retention from that one video was three times higher than our paid channels.

The thing about influencer coverage is its not just about the initial downloads; it's about credibility. When someone your audience trusts says "I actually use this and here's why it helps me", that carries weight no amount of Facebook ads can replicate. Plus, that content lives on—people find it months later through search and recommendations. One video or Instagram post can keep driving installs long after you've stopped paying for it. Sure, it takes more effort than just throwing money at ads, but the quality of users you get makes all the difference to your retention numbers. This is where understanding what makes apps successful becomes crucial—it's often about getting in front of the right users, not just more users.

Finding the Right Influencers for Your App

The biggest mistake I see with app founders is they immediately go after the influencers with millions of followers. I've worked on health tracking apps where we spent weeks chasing big fitness influencers with 500K+ followers, only to get rubbish conversion rates when we finally secured a post. The ones that actually moved the needle? Mid-tier creators with 10-50K highly engaged followers who genuinely used the app for weeks before posting about it. Its about relevance, not reach.

When we built a fintech app for one of our clients, we spent proper time mapping out who their actual users were—turns out they weren't following celebrity finance gurus at all. They were watching YouTube creators who made videos about budgeting for young families, scrolling through Instagram accounts that posted realistic money-saving tips. These creators had maybe 15-30K followers but their audience demographics matched our target users almost perfectly. The engagement rates were insane compared to what we'd seen with bigger names. This kind of thorough market research is essential before you start reaching out to creators.

Start by installing your competitors' apps and checking their social proof—look at who's already posting about similar apps in your category. These creators have already demonstrated they're willing to work with apps like yours, and their audience is clearly interested in what you're building.

What Actually Matters When Choosing Creators

After running dozens of influencer campaigns across e-commerce and education apps, I've learned to look at specific metrics that predict success. Follower count barely makes my top five priorities anymore, honestly. Here's what I actually check before reaching out:

• Engagement rate above 3% (calculate it yourself—dont trust what they tell you)
• Comments that show real conversations, not just emoji spam or "great post" rubbish
• Audience demographics that match your user research—age, location, interests
• Previous sponsored content that looks authentic, not awkwardly forced into their feed
• Regular posting schedule showing they're active and consistent
• Platform alignment with where your users actually spend time

One thing I've noticed working with education apps is that nano-influencers (1-10K followers) in niche communities often deliver better results than you'd expect. We had a language learning app that got more organic downloads from a TikTok creator with 8K followers who posted about study techniques than from a "study influencer" with 200K. The smaller creator's audience was specifically people actively trying to learn languages, not just students in general. That specificity matters more than most people realise when they're planning their outreach.

Creating Content That Influencers Actually Want to Share

Here's the thing about influencers—they get pitched constantly. I mean constantly. Every day their DMs are flooded with apps wanting coverage, so if you're sending them something generic or expecting them to do the heavy lifting of making your app look interesting, you've already lost. After working with dozens of clients on influencer campaigns, I've learned that what gets shared isn't necessarily the best app; it's the app that gives influencers the easiest path to creating content their audience will love.

The biggest mistake I see? Brands thinking influencers will just naturally figure out what's cool about their app. They won't. You need to hand them content that practically creates itself. For a fitness app we built, we didn't just give influencers access—we created a "30-day transformation challenge" with custom graphics they could post, daily prompts that fit perfectly into Stories, and achievement badges that looked brilliant on feed posts. The influencers didn't have to think about it; they just had to participate and the content wrote itself. Understanding what motivates users to share can inform how you create shareable content for influencers too.

What Makes Content Actually Shareable

Influencers share things that make them look good to their audience. Sounds obvious, but you'd be surprised how many apps forget this. If your app helps them deliver value to their followers—whether that's entertainment, education, or exclusive access—you're golden. For a meditation app client, we created "private sessions" that influencers could gift to their followers via unique codes. It wasn't just promotion; it was them genuinely giving their audience something valuable, which made the whole thing feel authentic rather than like an ad.

Visual assets matter more than most people realise. I'm talking high-quality screenshots that don't need editing, short video clips showing the app in action, and branded graphics that influencers can drop straight into their content without spending hours in Canva. For one e-commerce app, we provided influencers with before/after comparison templates they could customise—it took them two minutes to create content that looked professional and on-brand.

Content Types That Actually Get Results

Here's what I've seen work across different campaigns:

• Challenge-based content where followers can participate (30-day challenges, weekly goals, competitions)
• Exclusive features or early access that makes the influencer's audience feel special
• Results-driven content where the influencer can show genuine outcomes (weight loss, money saved, productivity gains)
• Behind-the-scenes access that gives their audience something they can't get elsewhere
• Comparison content that positions your app against manual methods or competitors (but keep it classy)

The key is making the influencer the hero of the story, not your app. Your app should be the tool that helped them achieve something or deliver value to their audience. When we worked on a language learning app, we didn't ask influencers to just show features—we had them document learning a new language in 90 days, with your app as their companion. The narrative was about their journey, and the app was just along for the ride. That's the difference between content that feels like an ad and content that gets genuine engagement.

How to Reach Out Without Looking Desperate

Right, so here's where most people mess it up—they send messages that scream "I need you more than you need me" and wonder why they get ghosted. I've watched hundreds of app launches over the years and the difference between a response rate of 5% and 50% often comes down to how you frame that first message. Its not about being manipulative; it's about showing you've done your homework and actually understand what the influencer cares about.

The biggest mistake? Leading with what you want. I worked on a meditation app launch where the founder sent messages saying "Can you post about my app?" to wellness influencers—zero responses. We rewrote the approach to focus on their content first, like "I noticed you've been talking about screen time issues in your last three posts... we built a feature that tracks meditation streaks without adding more notification noise." Response rate jumped to around 40% because suddenly it wasnt about us, it was about their audience's actual problems. This approach works much better than the common positioning mistakes that kill apps before they even get off the ground.

Your first message should demonstrate you're a fan of their work before you're a promoter of yours

Timing Matters More Than You Think

Don't reach out the week you launch unless you've been warming up that relationship for months. I mean it. The apps that get proper influencer coverage typically start conversations 6-8 weeks before launch, building genuine connection through comments on their content, sharing their posts, and occasionally asking for their input on small decisions. When you finally do pitch, keep it stupidly short—three sentences max. What you've noticed about their content, why your app solves something their audience struggles with, and a simple question like "would this be useful to share with your community?" No attachments in the first message. No press kits. Just human-to-human conversation that respects their time and intelligence. Consider timing this around your beta testing phase to get valuable feedback while building relationships.

Building Long-Term Relationships Instead of One-Off Posts

I've seen so many app founders treat influencer marketing like a transaction—pay someone for a single post, watch the downloads spike for a day or two, then wonder why it all goes quiet again. Its a massive missed opportunity really. The apps that get serious traction from influencers are the ones that build actual relationships, not just buy sponsored slots. I mean, think about it from the influencers perspective; they're constantly being bombarded with requests for one-off promotions, but the brands they genuinely advocate for over time? Those are the ones that treat them as partners, not billboard space.

What does this look like in practice? Well, when we launched a fitness tracking app a while back, we identified three mid-tier fitness influencers who were absolutely perfect for our target audience. Instead of asking for an immediate post, we started by genuinely engaging with their content—not in a creepy way, just authentic comments and shares when they posted something relevant. After a few weeks, we reached out offering them early access to features we were building and asked for their honest feedback. No payment, no obligation to post anything. Just "we respect your opinion and think you'd have valuable insights."

Two of them ended up becoming genuine advocates because they felt invested in the apps development. They posted about updates without us asking, mentioned the app in their stories when it was relevant to their content, and even suggested features their audience would love. That kind of organic, ongoing promotion is worth ten times more than a single sponsored post... but it requires patience and a willingness to give value before asking for anything in return. You've got to actually care about what they're creating, not just what they can do for you.

The other thing that works brilliantly is creating an influencer advisory board or early access programme. I've done this with several apps—healthcare, fintech, even a recipe app—and it transforms the relationship dynamic completely. Instead of being vendors and customers, you become collaborators. Send them beta features before public release, ask their opinion on new designs, give them real influence (see what I did there?) over the products direction. When people feel like they're part of building something, they naturally talk about it more authentically than any paid arrangement could achieve. Just be mindful of when to share your ideas and what information you're comfortable disclosing.

Paying for Promotion vs Getting Organic Coverage

I've spent a lot of money on paid influencer campaigns over the years, and I've also had apps go semi-viral through organic mentions. Here's what I've learned—both approaches work, but they work differently, and knowing when to use each one can save you thousands of pounds (or waste them if you get it wrong).

Paid promotion is faster and more predictable. You know exactly when the content goes live, what it'll say, and what kind of reach you're getting. I once worked on a fitness app where we paid a mid-tier fitness influencer about £1,500 for an Instagram story series and a reel. We got roughly 12,000 installs in 48 hours. But here's the thing—our retention after day 7 was only about 18% because those users hadn't discovered us naturally; they'd been sold to. The lifetime value just wasn't there compared to organic users. This is why evaluating your spending decisions carefully is crucial for sustainable growth.

Organic coverage is harder to get but much more valuable when it happens. Users who find your app through genuine influencer enthusiasm tend to stick around longer because they trust the recommendation more. The challenge? You cant control the timing or the message, and it might never happen at all. For a parenting app we built, we sent free premium access to about 30 parent influencers with no strings attached. Only 3 mentioned it, but those organic posts brought in users with 40% better retention than our paid campaigns.

Start with a small paid test to validate that influencer marketing works for your app category, then invest in building relationships for organic coverage once you've proven the channel.

When Each Approach Makes Sense

• Paid works best for launch pushes, specific campaign windows, or when you need measurable results fast
• Organic works better for building long-term credibility and attracting genuinely engaged users
• Paid gives you control over messaging and timing, which matters for coordinated launches
• Organic mentions carry more trust but require you to have a genuinely shareworthy product
• Paid can be tested and scaled quickly; organic takes months to build properly

The reality? Most successful apps use both. We typically allocate about 60% of budget to paid partnerships for predictable growth and 40% to relationship-building for organic coverage. The paid campaigns give us immediate results and data, while the organic relationships build authority and better quality users over time. You cant rely on just one approach unless you've got unlimited patience (organic only) or unlimited budget (paid only).

One mistake I see constantly is treating paid partnerships like transactions. Even when you're paying an influencer, the relationship still matters. The best paid partnerships happen when the influencer genuinely likes your app and the payment just makes it worth their time to create content about it. When it feels forced or purely transactional, audiences can smell it a mile away and your conversion rates suffer.

Tracking What Actually Works and What Doesn't

I'll be honest—most founders I work with get this bit completely wrong. They'll spend thousands on influencer campaigns and then track nothing more than total downloads. That's like opening a restaurant and only counting how many people walked through the door, not whether they actually ordered anything or came back for seconds.

The thing is, you need to set up proper attribution before you launch any influencer campaign, not after. I mean, it sounds obvious when I say it like that, but you'd be surprised how many apps I've seen launch these big campaigns with no tracking links, no promo codes, nothing. Just hoping they'll see a spike in downloads and assume it was the influencer. Its a complete waste of money really. Understanding how to track which posts drive installs is absolutely essential for measuring campaign success.

For one of our healthcare apps, we created unique deep links for each influencer using Branch.io—this let us track not just installs but what users did after downloading. Turned out one influencer with 50,000 followers was driving users who completed onboarding at 3x the rate of another with 200,000 followers. That smaller influencer? We doubled down on working with them. The bigger one? We didn't renew.

What You Actually Need to Measure

Don't just track vanity metrics like impressions or reach. Track the stuff that matters to your business; install-to-registration rates, day 7 retention, actual revenue if you're monetising quickly. For a fintech app we built, we discovered that influencer-driven users had 40% lower lifetime value than organic users—they were coming for the promo code discount and churning immediately. That completely changed our approach to who we partnered with and how we structured deals. You need to give your campaigns at least 30 days before making big decisions too, because some channels take time to show their real value. Also consider factors like how app performance affects retention—slow loading times can kill even the best influencer campaigns.

Common Mistakes That Kill Influencer Campaigns

I've watched so many app developers throw thousands of pounds at influencer campaigns only to see absolutely nothing in return, and honestly it's frustrating because most of these disasters could've been avoided. The biggest killer? Treating influencers like billboard space. I worked with a fintech app that spent £15,000 on a campaign with three mid-tier finance influencers—they sent the exact same script to all three, demanded specific hashtags, and controlled every word. The posts got decent engagement but zero conversions because the content felt like an advert rather than a genuine recommendation.

Another massive mistake is ignoring the warm-up period. You cant just cold-email an influencer asking them to promote your app—I mean you can but dont expect great results. I've seen healthcare apps reach out to wellness creators with generic pitches about "partnership opportunities" without ever engaging with their content first. The creators either ignore it completely or charge ridiculous rates because they assume you're just another company with a big budget and no clue. The apps that succeed spend weeks commenting on posts, sharing content, and building actual rapport before making any ask.

The worst thing you can do is measure success purely by impressions or likes—I've seen campaigns with millions of impressions generate fewer than 50 installs

Not setting up proper tracking is another campaign killer. Without unique promo codes, custom landing pages, or UTM parameters you're basically flying blind. An e-commerce app I worked with ran a campaign with eight micro-influencers but couldn't figure out which ones actually drove downloads because they used the same generic App Store link for everyone. They spent another £5,000 on a second round with the wrong creators because their data was useless. Set up attribution from day one or dont bother at all.

Conclusion

Getting influencers to talk about your app isn't rocket science, but it does require patience and a genuine understanding of what makes both influencers and their audiences tick. I've watched countless app launches over the years—some got massive influencer traction right out the gate, others struggled despite having bigger budgets. The difference? It usually comes down to whether the founder treated influencer outreach as a checklist item or as the start of an actual relationship.

One of the biggest lessons I've learned is that influencer marketing for apps works best when you stop thinking about it as "marketing" and start thinking about it as community building. The healthcare app we worked on that got featured by multiple health and wellness influencers didn't pay a penny upfront; they just gave early access to influencers who genuinely cared about mental health tools, asked for feedback, and made changes based on that input. Those influencers became advocates because they felt ownership over the product's direction.

The other thing worth remembering—and I mean really remembering—is that influencer campaigns aren't set-and-forget. You need to track what's working, adjust your approach when something isnt, and be honest about whether the influencers you're targeting actually align with your user base. I've seen too many apps waste money on macro-influencers with huge follower counts but zero engaged audience in the right demographic. Start small, test your messaging with micro-influencers who care about your category, and scale what actually drives installs and retention. Because at the end of the day, a thousand engaged users beats ten thousand disinterested downloads every single time.

Frequently Asked Questions